The auditing of open-source software (OSS) is rapidly emerging as a distinct field at the intersection of law, software engineering, cybersecurity, and corporate governance. While traditionally confined to niche technical tasks or legal due diligence during M&A, OSS auditing now demands frameworks that bridge disciplines and address complex, large-scale risk environments in both private and public sectors.

From Technical Review to Strategic Due Diligence

Open-source software comprises up to 90% of modern codebases, according to Forrester (2021). Its integration into proprietary systems has transformed OSS auditing from a back-office technical review to a critical component of corporate risk analysis, particularly in high-stakes contexts such as M&A, IPO preparation, and vendor assessments.

This shift reveals a key tension: auditing OSS today is no longer solely a technical process, nor is it purely legal. It entails identifying license obligations, potential copyright violations, security vulnerabilities, and reputational risk, often without access to the source code itself. As such, new hybrid methodologies—like Fossity’s fingerprint-based, zero-access model—signal a need to reconceptualize the OSS audit as a multidimensional process.

The Need for a Cross-Disciplinary Framework

Current standards in OSS auditing are scattered across multiple domains. Legal teams look at license compliance and liability, IT departments focus on security vulnerabilities, and product managers consider technical debt and delivery timelines. However, there is no unified audit framework that integrates these perspectives into a single operational model.

This disciplinary fragmentation creates inefficiencies and inconsistencies. A company may “pass” a legal OSS review but later discover a critical vulnerability or unreported component affecting a system’s security or export compliance. In academic terms, the lack of epistemological alignment across disciplines leads to false negatives and unresolved accountability.

A new academic and industry consensus is slowly forming around the need for integrated OSS audit methodologies—a field that could resemble financial auditing in its regulatory weight, yet remain technically agile to adapt to evolving software landscapes.

The Role of Regulation and Policy

Emerging regulations further reinforce the need for academic rigor in this space. The U.S. Executive Order 14028 on Improving the Nation’s Cybersecurity (2021) and the European Union’s Cyber Resilience Act both emphasize the role of Software Bills of Materials (SBOMs) and auditability in software supply chains.

These policy frameworks are not merely bureaucratic formalities. They raise fundamental questions about the auditability of digital systems, traceability of software components, and responsibility in the case of noncompliance. They also suggest that OSS auditing, like environmental or financial audits, may soon require third-party attestation and publicly accountable methodologies.

This positions OSS auditing as a prime candidate for academic standardization, including the development of peer-reviewed methodologies, training programs, and ethical standards.

Toward a Research Agenda

What would a robust academic agenda for OSS auditing include?

• Methodological Studies: Comparing traditional SCA (Software Composition Analysis) tools versus alternative models like Fossity’s fingerprinting for speed, accuracy, and confidentiality.
  
• Legal-Tech Integration: Building models for aligning license verification with trade regulation and cybersecurity compliance in a single flow.
  
• Audit Ethics and Epistemology: Examining how audits produce “knowledge” in environments of partial access and high confidentiality.
  
• Impact Studies: Evaluating how OSS audit quality affects transaction success rates, particularly in M&A.
  

Academic involvement could also spur the development of open audit repositories, where anonymized fingerprints and audit data contribute to a collective risk intelligence pool.

To Conclude

The auditing of open-source software is evolving from an operational necessity to an academic and strategic field of study. It offers fertile ground for interdisciplinary research, policy development, and methodological innovation. As software supply chains continue to grow in complexity, and regulatory environments demand higher accountability, this field will only expand in significance—and will require both the rigor of academia and the agility of startups like Fossity to shape its future.

Ready to bring academic rigor to your open-source audits?

Discover how Fossity’s innovative, confidentiality-first method is shaping the future of OSS auditing. Get in touch to explore how our approach can reduce risk, save time, and align with evolving regulatory demands—without ever accessing your code.

👉 Contact us here